Second Life Future Salon: Stanley Milgram experiment comes to a Virtual World

The electric-shock obedience experiment sent Stanley Milgram into infamy. It also was the catalyst for American Psychological Association to adopt ethical considerations when performing psychological experiments on people. Plus One reports that a group in London re-ran the same experiment in a virtual world and the results were eerily similar. The participants showed comparable stress and anxiety levels. Their conclusions?

Our results show that in spite of the fact that all participants knew for sure that neither the stranger nor the shocks were real, the participants who saw and heard her tended to respond to the situation at the subjective, behavioral and physiological levels as if it were real. This result reopens the door to direct empirical studies of obedience and related extreme social situations, an area of research that is otherwise not open to experimental study for ethical reasons, through the employment of virtual environments

My conclusion? I am not all that concerned with the world of obedience studies but what I am concerned with is the empirical proof that a virtual world can have a comparable emotional impact on is residents as real world activities. This being said it lends additional support to engaging in psycho-significant research and therapeutic activities in the medium. For the human service sector it provides further credence to the Asperger's therapy work that is currently experiencing success in virtual worlds such as Second Life.

Comments

Randall:

BTW, this experiment wasn't actually in SL, but rather in a more immersive "virtual reality room" so the title to your post is misleading.

Posted by: Peter S. Jenkins | January 07, 2007 at 06:36 PM

The work so far on ostracism shows that you get similar psychological and physiological responses from people online and face to face, so I suppose this is possible. But honestly I'd really like to see the original study. A key part of the first Milgram experiments was that participants DIDN'T know the shocks were false. If you take that element out, the comparison seems suspect.

Posted by: Austin Harley | June 27, 2007 at 12:29 PM

cheap@giag.com

Posted by: generic viagra | July 27, 2007 at 04:54 PM

cheap@viagra.com

Posted by: cheap viagra | July 27, 2007 at 06:44 PM

Posted by: discount viagra | July 27, 2007 at 08:23 PM

Posted by: buy generic viagra | July 27, 2007 at 10:14 PM

Posted by: order online viagra | July 28, 2007 at 03:23 AM

Posted by: online viagra | July 28, 2007 at 05:10 AM

cheap@cialis.com

Posted by: buy cialis | July 28, 2007 at 11:40 AM

Posted by: generic cialis | July 28, 2007 at 01:29 PM